<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Erman Y Photography &#187; good and bad points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ermany.net/tag/good-and-bad-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ermany.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cameras; Pros and Cons of Canon 400 D (Rebel Xti)</title>
		<link>http://ermany.net/2008/08/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-400-d-rebel-xti/</link>
		<comments>http://ermany.net/2008/08/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-400-d-rebel-xti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[400D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 400D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good and bad points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon 400 D &#8211; Rebel Xti [ad#content2] Pros: 1. Low noise level. 2. Detailed, high quality images. 3. Anti-Dust System 4. Great Performance/Price ratio. Cons: 1. Anti-Dust system is not so effective. 2. Kit lens is not good enough. Average Body Price: $520 Average Kit Price: $600 Cons:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Canon 400 D &#8211; Rebel Xti</h1>
<div id="attachment_305" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/400d.jpg" rel="lightbox[304]"><img class="size-full wp-image-305" title="400d" src="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/400d.jpg" alt="Canon 400 D" width="400" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon 400 D</p></div>
<p>[ad#content2]</p>
<h2>Pros:</h2>
<p>1. Low noise level.</p>
<p>2. Detailed, high quality images.</p>
<p>3. Anti-Dust System</p>
<p>4. Great Performance/Price ratio.</p>
<h2>Cons:</h2>
<p>1. Anti-Dust system is not so effective.</p>
<p>2. Kit lens is not good enough.</p>
<p><strong>Average Body Price: $520<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Average Kit Price: $600</strong></p>
<p>Cons:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ermany.net/2008/08/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-400-d-rebel-xti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras; Good and Bad Points of Nikon D300</title>
		<link>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-nikon-d300/</link>
		<comments>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-nikon-d300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good and bad points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D300 (One of my favorite DSLRs) [ad#content2] Pros; 1. Superb Build 2. Weather Seal 3. This camera is fast; 6 fps Shooting 4. Great Auto-Focus System; 51-Point AF 5. 3inch VGA screen 6. Live View 7. Excellent Viewfinder ; provides %100 coverage Cons; 1. Anti-Dust system is not so effective. 2. A little bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon D300</h1>
<p>(One of my favorite DSLRs)</p>
<p><a href="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/d300.jpg" rel="lightbox[294]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-295" title="d300" src="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/d300.jpg" alt="D300" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>[ad#content2]</p>
<h2>Pros;</h2>
<p>1. Superb Build</p>
<p>2. Weather Seal</p>
<p>3. This camera is fast; 6 fps Shooting</p>
<p>4. Great Auto-Focus System; 51-Point AF</p>
<p>5. 3inch VGA screen</p>
<p>6. Live View</p>
<p>7. Excellent Viewfinder ; provides %100 coverage</p>
<h2>Cons;</h2>
<p>1. Anti-Dust system is not so effective.</p>
<p>2. A little bit expensive<br />
<strong>Average Body Price ; $1600</strong></p>
<p><strong>Average Kit Price ; $1900</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-nikon-d300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras; Pros and Cons of Canon 40D</title>
		<link>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-40d/</link>
		<comments>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-40d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 40D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good and bad points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon 40D [ad#content2] Pros; 1. Quick handling; a good body shape 2. Live View ability 3. Anti &#8211; Dust System 4. PC control Cons; 1. It is only 10 megapixels, not good enough for a semi-pro SLR 2. Non-VGA screen 3. No HDMI Average Body Price : $1000 Average Kit Price : $1300]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Canon 40D</h1>
<p><a href="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/40d.jpg" rel="lightbox[292]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-293" title="40d" src="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/40d.jpg" alt="40D " width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>[ad#content2]</p>
<h2>Pros;</h2>
<p>1. Quick handling; a good body shape</p>
<p>2. Live View ability</p>
<p>3. Anti &#8211; Dust  System</p>
<p>4. PC control</p>
<h2>Cons;</h2>
<p>1. It is only 10 megapixels, not good enough for a semi-pro SLR</p>
<p>2. Non-VGA screen</p>
<p>3. No HDMI</p>
<p><strong>Average Body Price : $1000</strong></p>
<p><strong>Average Kit Price : $1300</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-canon-40d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras; Pros and Cons of Nikon D80</title>
		<link>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-nikon-d80/</link>
		<comments>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-nikon-d80/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good and bad points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D80 [ad#content2] Pros 1. Low noise level; due to sensor type (CCD) 2. Great Build 3. High resolution Images 4. Great Viewfinder Cons 1. Expensive for a 10Mpixel DSLR 2. No Anti-Dust 3. No Live View 4. No Anti-Shake Average Body Price : $720 Average Kit Price : $970]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Nikon D80</h1>
<p><a href="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/d80.jpg" rel="lightbox[288]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-289" title="d80" src="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/d80.jpg" alt="D80" width="480" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>[ad#content2]</p>
<h2>Pros</h2>
<p>1. Low noise level; due to sensor type (CCD)</p>
<p>2. Great Build</p>
<p>3. High resolution Images</p>
<p>4. Great Viewfinder</p>
<h2>Cons</h2>
<p>1. Expensive for a 10Mpixel DSLR</p>
<p>2. No Anti-Dust</p>
<p>3. No Live View</p>
<p>4. No Anti-Shake</p>
<p><strong>Average Body Price : $720</strong></p>
<p><strong>Average Kit Price : $970 </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-pros-and-cons-of-nikon-d80/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras; Good and Bad Points of Sony Alpha DSLR &#8211; A350</title>
		<link>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-sony-alpha-dslr-a350/</link>
		<comments>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-sony-alpha-dslr-a350/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a350]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good and bad points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ermany.net/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starting from today I&#8217;ll write good and bad points of some DSLRs briefly. Sony Alpha DSLR &#8211; A350 [ad#content2] Pros 1. There is a built-in Anti-Shake system in Sony A350. 2. LCD screen behind the camera can tilt up and down. 3. Live View is pretty fast. Cons 1. Viewfinder is small. 2. Slow continuous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting from today I&#8217;ll write good and bad points of some DSLRs briefly.</p>
<h1>Sony Alpha DSLR &#8211; A350</h1>
<p><a href="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/sony-alpha.jpg" rel="lightbox[286]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-287" title="sony-alpha" src="http://ermany.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/sony-alpha.jpg" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR - A350" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>[ad#content2]</p>
<h2>Pros</h2>
<p>1. There is a built-in Anti-Shake system in Sony A350.</p>
<p>2. LCD screen behind the camera can tilt up and down.</p>
<p>3. Live  View is pretty fast.</p>
<h2>Cons</h2>
<p>1. Viewfinder is small.</p>
<p>2. Slow continuous shooting</p>
<p>3. Live view is not %100 accurate.</p>
<p><strong>Average Body Price : $700</strong></p>
<p><strong>Average Kit Price : $800</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ermany.net/2008/07/cameras-good-and-bad-points-of-sony-alpha-dslr-a350/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

